top of page

Without Putin and Trump: Russia and Ukraine hold first Istanbul talks in three years

5/16/25

By:

Michael K.

Russia and Ukraine in the same room, but far apart: mandates, irreconcilable positions and hints of flexibility

Russia Ukraine Türkiye USA

As I reported yesterday morning on my social-media channel, it emerged late on 14 May that neither Vladimir Putin nor Donald Trump would attend the Istanbul talks. This was confirmed by the Kremlin (Reuters: “Putin currently has no plans to go to Istanbul talks”) and by Turkish and American sources (Bloomberg).


The day before yesterday, I outlined several possible scenarios in my piece on CovalentBond. Two in particular—Scenario 3 (neither Trump nor Putin attends) and Scenario 5 (talks are postponed)—have come to pass: the first late on 14 May, the second on 15 May.


Participants


Russia: Delegation led by presidential adviser Vladimir Medinsky, including Deputy Defence Minister Alexander Fomin and Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Galuzin (Reuters: “Putin to skip Ukraine talks, Russian team includes seasoned negotiators”)


Ukraine: Delegation led by Defence Minister Rustem Umerov, with Serhiy Kislytsia, Oleksandr Poklad, Oleh Lukhovskyi, and others (Reuters: “Ukraine Russia live updates: Zelenskiy says he won’t join Istanbul talks after Putin sent ‘decorative’ delegation”)


USA: Delegation led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump’s special envoy, Keith Kellogg (Reuters: “Russians and Ukrainians in Turkey for what would be first talks in three years”)


Turkey (host): Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and the Turkish MFA team (TRT Global: “Delegations for peace talks between Russia, Ukraine in Istanbul determined”)


Timeline: 15 May 2025


Morning: Russian and Ukrainian delegations flew into Istanbul and completed registration for the talks.


Appointments & Criticism: President Zelenskiy named Defence Minister Rustem Umerov head of the Ukrainian team and lambasted Russia’s “low-level” delegation under Medinsky (Reuters).


15:35 UTC: Aboard Air Force One, Donald Trump declared, “Nothing will happen until Putin and I meet.” (Reuters)


16:10 UTC: Secretary Rubio called the talks a “logjam” and stressed that a breakthrough depends on a personal Trump–Putin meeting (Reuters).


Later in the Day: President Zelenskiy arrived in Ankara to meet Erdoğan and finalise the trilateral format.


Evening: Labour leader Keir Starmer said, “Putin is stalling and not serious about peace.” (Reuters)


Late Evening: Yahoo News reported that the official start was postponed until Friday, 16 May (Yahoo News).


Timeline: 16 May 2025


10:12 CET: US President Trump said he wanted to meet Putin “as soon as we can.”


10:56 CET: BBC: “Ukraine’s ceasefire proposal left on the shelf” — Ukraine’s 30-day ceasefire plan, backed by the US and EU, was rejected by Russia.


12:44 CET: Official opening of direct talks in Dolmabahçe under Turkey’s auspices.


13:03 CET: For the first time in three years, Russian and Ukrainian delegations shared a room:


Zelenskiy: “Our mandate is an immediate ceasefire.”


Russia (yesterday): Focus on long-term peace and “removing the root causes of this crisis”—in practice, a challenge to Ukraine’s sovereignty.


Head of Russia’s team: Mentioned willingness to discuss compromises, but offered no details; others insisted on original demands—no NATO for Ukraine and Russian control of at least five Ukrainian regions, unacceptable to Kyiv (BBC).


Outlook & Possible Scenarios


1. Top-Level Breakthrough

Only a face-to-face meeting between Trump and Putin can yield a major agreement; without them, progress is unlikely.


2. Temporary Ceasefire (30-Day Plan)

A one-month truce could open humanitarian corridors, yet Russia has already rejected Ukraine’s proposal.


3. Low-Level Impasse

Technical talks at the adviser and ministerial level continue with little progress, confirming US “low expectations” and Rubio’s scepticism.


4. Further Postponement

The talks may be delayed again over disagreements on format and participants, as seen with the recent shift to Friday.


5. Expanded Multilateral Format

Involving the EU, UN or other key players (e.g. China, the UK) to produce a broader “Istanbul Communiqué” and security guarantees—an idea floated as early as the 2022 negotiations (Reuters: “Putin’s negotiator… aims to secure long-lasting peace”).

Latest news

10/16/25

Tomahawk as Threat and Bluff: What Trump Actually Said — and What It Changes for the War

Politics likes to speak in the language of iron. Sometimes one word — "Tomahawk" — is enough to change the tone of geopolitics

8/13/25

Alaska, August 15

Trump and Putin to Meet for First Time Since 2021 to Discuss Ukraine’s Fate

8/9/25

August 8, 2025: Deadline Expired, Alaska Meeting Scheduled

Expired Ultimatum and Unexpected Turn

8/5/25

The Balkan Crisis

Corruption, Separatism and Student Uprising

8/2/25

Tariff Versus Peace: The U.S. Launches a New Trade Blockade

Washington strikes with tariffs against 69 countries and signs deals with loyal ones. A new world order is being built on preferences and threats

7/30/25

Discipline Through the Market: Why the U.S. Is Pushing China to the Edge

Deals with Japan and Indonesia have become the benchmark. Beijing hesitates. But Washington has only one scenario: those who refuse face tariffs

7/29/25

Trump Shortens the Deadline

Sanctions Ultimatum, Diplomatic Deadlock, and a Waiting Game

7/28/25

Tariff or Capitulation

What the US-EU Agreement Is Really About

7/25/25

The Fires of Diplomacy

How Five Different Stories Reveal the Reality of a New Global Politics

7/24/25

Special Terms

How Japan, Indonesia, and the Philippines Secured Tariff Preferences from the United States

7/23/25

Pure Oil. Dirty Arithmetic

How the Hungary–Serbia pipeline became a pipeline in Europe’s face, and why gasoline in Belgrade costs more than in the Czech Republic

7/21/25

Battery, Coalition, Ultimatum

How the July 21 Meeting Turned the UDCG from a Council into a Coalition Headquarters for Europe’s Defense

7/19/25

Sanctions at the Limit of Faith

Why the EU’s 18th Sanctions Package Looks Powerful — but Works Halfway

7/17/25

The Return of the Silk Road

Why China’s BRI Initiative Is Back in the Spotlight

7/15/25

A Slap Across the Balkans: How 35% Became a Sign of Dissent

Serbia and Republika Srpska received from Trump not economic punishment, but a political warning — wrapped in rhetoric, symbols, and threats against the backdrop of Russia, China, and Europe

7/14/25

The Rome Preamble

From the "Roman Circle" to Trump's Ultimatum — The New Course Toward Russia

7/11/25

EXIT as a Mirror of Freedom

From Student Protest in the 2000s to Defunding in 2025

7/10/25

Roman Circle: Patriot, Oil, and 500%

On the sidelines of the URC summit in Rome, a new architecture of support for Ukraine is taking shape: informal alliances, sanctions with flexible enforcement, and direct moves by the White House

7/9/25

Third Summer. No Elections. With Protest

Since July 2025, protests in Serbia have extended beyond the student community and reached dozens of cities. The authorities respond more harshly; the opposition is absent, and dialogue is nonexistent

7/8/25

Tariffs by Hand: How Trump Writes the Economy with Commas and Capital Letters

A series of ultimatum letters from Donald Trump has shaken markets and diplomacy. From “Dear Mr. President” to “You will never be disappointed”—a new style of old politics.

Covalent Bond Logo

Journalism (Independent)

Commentary

Your humble servant tries to be as unbiased an analyst as possible.

© 2025 by COVALENT BOND

bottom of page