top of page

Israel and Iran Announce Ceasefire Brokered by Trump: The Situation Remains Fragile

6/24/25

By:

Michael K.

Strikes on U.S. bases and mutual accusations threaten to derail the agreement

Iran Israel USA Ceasefire

On June 24, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump announced via his Truth Social account that a “full and complete” ceasefire agreement had been reached between Israel and Iran. According to Trump’s statement, the ceasefire was set to take effect within several hours, beginning with an initial 12-hour phase, with the ultimate goal of ending the 12-day armed conflict (Reuters).


Israel officially confirmed its acceptance of the U.S. proposal. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that the Israeli government supported Trump’s initiative and was prepared to implement the agreement (Reuters). A similar announcement was broadcast by Iranian state television.


Conflict Retrospective


The escalation between Israel and Iran began on June 13, 2025, following the breakdown of negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear program. After a series of warnings from the United States, Israel launched a series of missile strikes on June 13, targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. Iran responded with a massive missile barrage—both cruise and ballistic missiles—against Israel. Mutual strikes continued until U.S. forces intervened on June 22 with Operation Midnight Hammer, delivering massive airstrikes on key Iranian nuclear facilities, including Fordow and Natanz. The author previously covered this phase of the escalation on Covalent Bond.


At that point, the situation was on the verge of escalating into a large-scale conflict involving the allies of both sides. It was at this critical juncture that diplomatic channels were activated.


The Role of Mediators


Qatar played a key role in securing the ceasefire. According to Reuters, it was the Qatari Prime Minister who, after a personal phone call with the U.S. President and several Arab leaders, succeeded in persuading Iran’s leadership to agree to the ceasefire.


The ceasefire agreement involves a two-stage process: an initial halt to hostilities by Iran, followed by Israel, with a 12-hour stabilization period and the potential for extension. Signals from Washington, indicating a willingness to restrain further Israeli airstrikes provided Tehran refrains from new attacks, were critical to launching this diplomatic initiative.


The U.S., through Trump and the State Department, played a central role in the negotiations, engaging directly with Israeli leadership. Qatar, maintaining established communication channels with Tehran, assumed the task of securing Iran’s consent.


Challenges and Risks


In the first hours following the official ceasefire announcement, both sides exchanged accusations of violating the agreement (Reuters). According to American sources, there was localized artillery activity and drone usage. Iranian rockets struck Israeli territory—sirens were activated in the north, with four fatalities reported in Be’er Sheva (DW). In addition, Iranian rockets targeted U.S. military bases in Kuwait and the UAE (The Guardian). In retaliation, Israel launched “intensive strikes” on Tehran, following an order from the Defense Minister. Iranian media (ISNA) has since denied these accusations (AlJazeera).


In a new post on Truth Social, Donald Trump expressed disappointment with both sides and warned Israel against launching further airstrikes: “Don’t drop bombs.” Such public statements underscore the continuing high level of tension.


Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stressed the extreme fragility of the agreement, stating that “it is impossible to predict how long it will last,” given the current level of mutual distrust between the parties (Reuters).


Experts note that beyond the immediate risks of ceasefire collapse, structural factors of the conflict persist: the nuclear issue, Tehran’s regional ambitions, and domestic political dynamics in Israel. All of these elements could once again lead to renewed escalation.

Latest news

10/16/25

Tomahawk as Threat and Bluff: What Trump Actually Said — and What It Changes for the War

Politics likes to speak in the language of iron. Sometimes one word — "Tomahawk" — is enough to change the tone of geopolitics

8/13/25

Alaska, August 15

Trump and Putin to Meet for First Time Since 2021 to Discuss Ukraine’s Fate

8/9/25

August 8, 2025: Deadline Expired, Alaska Meeting Scheduled

Expired Ultimatum and Unexpected Turn

8/5/25

The Balkan Crisis

Corruption, Separatism and Student Uprising

8/2/25

Tariff Versus Peace: The U.S. Launches a New Trade Blockade

Washington strikes with tariffs against 69 countries and signs deals with loyal ones. A new world order is being built on preferences and threats

7/30/25

Discipline Through the Market: Why the U.S. Is Pushing China to the Edge

Deals with Japan and Indonesia have become the benchmark. Beijing hesitates. But Washington has only one scenario: those who refuse face tariffs

7/29/25

Trump Shortens the Deadline

Sanctions Ultimatum, Diplomatic Deadlock, and a Waiting Game

7/28/25

Tariff or Capitulation

What the US-EU Agreement Is Really About

7/25/25

The Fires of Diplomacy

How Five Different Stories Reveal the Reality of a New Global Politics

7/24/25

Special Terms

How Japan, Indonesia, and the Philippines Secured Tariff Preferences from the United States

7/23/25

Pure Oil. Dirty Arithmetic

How the Hungary–Serbia pipeline became a pipeline in Europe’s face, and why gasoline in Belgrade costs more than in the Czech Republic

7/21/25

Battery, Coalition, Ultimatum

How the July 21 Meeting Turned the UDCG from a Council into a Coalition Headquarters for Europe’s Defense

7/19/25

Sanctions at the Limit of Faith

Why the EU’s 18th Sanctions Package Looks Powerful — but Works Halfway

7/17/25

The Return of the Silk Road

Why China’s BRI Initiative Is Back in the Spotlight

7/15/25

A Slap Across the Balkans: How 35% Became a Sign of Dissent

Serbia and Republika Srpska received from Trump not economic punishment, but a political warning — wrapped in rhetoric, symbols, and threats against the backdrop of Russia, China, and Europe

7/14/25

The Rome Preamble

From the "Roman Circle" to Trump's Ultimatum — The New Course Toward Russia

7/11/25

EXIT as a Mirror of Freedom

From Student Protest in the 2000s to Defunding in 2025

7/10/25

Roman Circle: Patriot, Oil, and 500%

On the sidelines of the URC summit in Rome, a new architecture of support for Ukraine is taking shape: informal alliances, sanctions with flexible enforcement, and direct moves by the White House

7/9/25

Third Summer. No Elections. With Protest

Since July 2025, protests in Serbia have extended beyond the student community and reached dozens of cities. The authorities respond more harshly; the opposition is absent, and dialogue is nonexistent

7/8/25

Tariffs by Hand: How Trump Writes the Economy with Commas and Capital Letters

A series of ultimatum letters from Donald Trump has shaken markets and diplomacy. From “Dear Mr. President” to “You will never be disappointed”—a new style of old politics.

Covalent Bond Logo

Journalism (Independent)

Commentary

Your humble servant tries to be as unbiased an analyst as possible.

© 2025 by COVALENT BOND

bottom of page